Disclaimer: Views in this blog do not promote, and are not directly connected to any L&G product or service. Views are from a range of L&G investment professionals, may be specific to an author’s particular investment region or desk, and do not necessarily reflect the views of L&G. For investment professionals only.

12 Sep 2019
2 min read

Drawing down without drawing a blank

In Part III of this series we discuss Centralised Retirement Propositions (CRPs). We have seen a number of financial planners post-pension freedom rebadge their existing Centralised Investment Propositions (CIPs), which have been designed for accumulation, into CRPs. As volatility increases, concerns are growing that sequencing risk (sometimes called “pound-cost ravaging”) could have a devastating impact on their client’s investments. But what can advisers do to help mitigate this and design more decumulation-focused portfolios?

1140-x-413-woman-checking-graphs.jpg

View Part I & Part II here.

Risk Management Video Volatility
Generic team image

L&G’s Asset Management division

More articles by L&G’s Asset Management

Recommended content for you

Learn more about our business

We are one of the world's largest asset managers, with capabilities across asset classes to meet our clients' objectives and a longstanding commitment to responsible investing.

Image of London skyscrapers

Sign up for blog email alerts

Receive the latest articles in a weekly digest by registering via the email preference centre