Disclaimer: Views in this blog do not promote, and are not directly connected to any L&G product or service. Views are from a range of L&G investment professionals, may be specific to an author’s particular investment region or desk, and do not necessarily reflect the views of L&G. For investment professionals only.

23 Mar 2018
2 min read

EM exports and US protectionism – the trade-off

The revised Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement was finally signed in March - over a year after President Trump removed the United States as a signatory. We take a quick look at how much emerging markets depend on the US as a trading partner.

1140-x-413-full-cargo-ship.jpg

Eleven countries have signed the CPTPP agreement: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. The agreement is an example of the type of cross-regional integration that should help reduce the risk of geopolitical uncertainty and conflict.

It would not only be a shame but also an initial economic blow for individual emerging market (EM) countries if the US became more introverted from its already low export/GDP ratio of 8% compared to, for example, Germany’s 40%.

Even though EM countries overall are increasingly diversifying their trading partners, they will be disappointed to see a more introverted US trade policy.

But, the reality is that the world has changed in the past few decades, with EM countries as a group now sending almost 60% of their total exports to fellow EM countries (see the chart below).

Indeed, while the US still consumes a sizeable 16% of EM exports, that is a far cry from the post-1995 peak of 25%. Much of that has been taken up by China, which now consumes around 12% of EM exports and will likely continue to increase its share as it grows at a faster rate than most countries.

Even though EM countries overall are increasingly diversifying themselves away from depending on single trading partners, they will be disappointed to see a more introverted US trade policy. In my next post on the subject, I will be examining the individual countries, such as Mexico, which would have the most to lose.

Active fixed income Emerging Markets
uday-patnaik-l50.jpg

Uday Patnaik

Head of Emerging Markets Debt, Asset Management, L&G

Uday is responsible for developing active emerging market capabilities for L&G’s Asset Management division. Uday has 30 years of experience investing in emerging market fixed income securities, including... 

More about Uday

Recommended content for you

Learn more about our business

We are one of the world's largest asset managers, with capabilities across asset classes to meet our clients' objectives and a longstanding commitment to responsible investing.

Image of London skyscrapers

Sign up for blog email alerts

Receive the latest articles in a weekly digest by registering via the email preference centre